Introduction
No organization is immune from a crisis. The question is not whether one will come, but whether your team is ready when it does.
Alongside operational failures, financial scandals, and leadership controversies, PR teams now contend with data breaches, AI-generated misinformation, deepfakes, and social media incidents that can escalate from a single post to a full reputational emergency within hours. The speed at which a story can spread - and the number of channels it can spread across - has raised the stakes for every organization.
The main goal of crisis communication should then be to protect your brand’s reputation. This involves engaging with the media and the public in an open, timely way and giving them information that is accurate and has been verified. In the age of AI-powered search, it also means making sure your owned channels are the most reliable source of information about your brand, so that journalists, stakeholders, and AI systems all find the same verified version of events.
When it comes to a crisis, preparation is everything. Teams must be adequately trained and have practice in simulated scenarios in order to perform effectively when a real situation develops.
1. What is a crisis?
In short, a crisis is an unexpected event that has the potential to negatively impact your company’s reputation. A crisis is the ultimate test of your brand equity. When everything is going well, it’s relatively easy for a strong brand to maintain a good relationship with the public. But what happens when a crisis breaks?
That could include everything from unfortunate tweets that leave your company looking crass or unprofessional to major operational crises where lives may be at risk, or the future of the organization is at stake.
Some examples of crises your company may have to deal with include:
- Operational disruptions that prevent you from offering your services
- High profile court cases were taken against your company
- Financial scandals
- A disaster at one of your factories or operational locations
- Accusations against your company or senior leadership
- Data breaches and cyber incidents affecting customer or employee data
- AI-generated misinformation or deepfakes involving your brand or leadership
- Social media incidents that escalate rapidly across platforms
- Supply chain failures with public safety or reputational implication
Depending on the nature of the crisis, the Public Relations team works closely with other internal stakeholders including Legal, HR, Health and Safety, and Operations to ensure a cohesive corporate response. The acronym PEARL can be used to determine corporate priorities in a crisis.
P – People: What people are impacted? They come first.
E – Environment: Is there an environmental impact?
A – Assets: How does this crisis affect the company’s assets?
R – Reputation: How can the team manage the impact on the company’s reputation?
L – Learnings: Afterwards, it’s important to look at any learnings
While reputation comes fourth on the list, it’s the item that is the primary responsibility of the PR team. It’s the Public Relations department’s responsibility to have a well thought out crisis communications and PR strategy ready as and when it’s needed. The plan should be documented in a written procedure, saved somewhere central so that it’s easy to access, and reviewed and updated every year.
2. Anticipating a crisis
On an annual basis, companies should complete a SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat) analysis with the aim of predicting any crises that might come up in the next 12 months.
The types of crisis that are likely to come up vary from company to company:
- An airline will always plan for a scenario where an aircraft fails
- A food production company might plan for a scenario where a batch of food needs to be recalled for health and safety reasons
- Manufacturing companies need to plan for product failures
- Software companies might identify their most likely crisis as the threat of a data hack.
It’s important to consult your leadership team as a whole in identifying what the top three or top five most likely crisis scenarios are, and putting a clear PR crisis plan in place to address them. Later in the guide, we’ll discuss the importance of crisis simulations – you can use your most likely crisis scenarios as the basis for these simulations.
Naturally, when a company knows what crises are likely to come up, they should take steps to mitigate against them. Prevention is better than cure when it comes to a crisis. But if prevention is not possible, a general awareness of the types of crises that might come up is very useful in planning.
Case Study: Getting it right - Singapore AirlinesWhen Singapore Airlines Flight SQ321 encountered severe turbulence over Myanmar, one passenger died and 79 others were injured. It was a major incident with global media attention within hours. |
Case Study: Getting it wrong - PG&EPacific Gas & Electric, California's largest utility company, faced a reputational crisis years in the making. PG&E equipment was found responsible for numerous wildfires across California, including the 2018 Camp Fire - the deadliest wildfire in California's history - which burned nearly 14,000 homes and killed more than 80 people. The company's crisis response was widely criticized for being slow, defensive, and inconsistent. Rather than proactively communicating with affected communities, PG&E was repeatedly found to have delayed safety measures, suppressed internal risk assessments, and failed to give the public clear, timely information. When it eventually implemented power shutoffs to reduce fire risk in 2019, the rollout affected over one million customers and was initially accompanied by poor communication that left communities without adequate warning or guidance. In January 2019, PG&E filed for bankruptcy. In 2020, the company pleaded guilty to 84 counts of involuntary manslaughter in connection with the Camp Fire. California later fined PG&E $106 million for insufficient communication with the public during its 2019 power shutoffs. |
Brand and reputation
Your brand is the message you give the public about what you stand for, but reputation is the public’s interpretation of what you stand for. The public’s perception of an organization is vital to its ability to stay profitable. It’s important that your leadership team, products, and services have credibility. A crisis can threaten that, so it’s crucial that PR teams know exactly how to handle it when one comes up.
RepTrak releases a major global report each year ranking brands according to how strong their reputation is with consumers. Consistently, the companies that top those rankings share a common trait: they invest in their reputation long before a crisis hits. That sustained investment creates a bedrock of goodwill and credibility with the public, and it is that goodwill that determines how quickly trust can be rebuilt when something goes wrong.
RepTrak claims that this strong reputation creates an emotional bond between consumers and companies that can have a dramatic impact on the following:
- Whether consumers will buy your product
- If the general public would recommend your company
- Policymakers and regulators in giving you a license to operate
- The financial community’s willingness to invest in your organization
- How the media reports your point of view
- Whether employees deliver on your strategy
Working on your reputation during peacetime
One way companies have prepared for the impact of a crisis in ‘peacetime’ is through Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which includes community initiatives, charity partnerships, or environmental sustainability.
More recently (and perhaps more effectively), CSR principles have been expanded by companies who tackle them holistically across their business model. This doesn’t mean that they will completely mitigate the risks they might face, but that their audiences are more likely to be forgiving – if they perceive their behaviour as authentic.
The difference lies in the company’s level of involvement with issues that their audiences or the public opinion might be concerned about. If journalists have started asking why most of your leadership team is male or caucasian, a traditional CSR approach would suggest you can anticipate controversies and counter them by supporting charities that promote diversity and inclusion. And while that can still come in handy, you might encounter backlash for not engaging with the subject internally. An even more effective approach could be to talk openly about why there is a lack of diversity, commit to it and outline a few of the steps you’re taking to get there.
Beyond its positive effect on your reputation, businesses that prove to be genuinely concerned about their impact can become more attractive to investors who include ethical impact and sustainability practices in their valuations, for example. Whichever actions you decide to take, make sure they can be traced back to your company values and connected to an action plan so you can talk the talk and walk the walk.
Media relationships and reputation
Another important consideration in maintaining a strong reputation is the company’s relationship with the media. If your CEO has never given an interview until the day a crisis breaks, journalists are likely to give them a hard time as an unknown quantity.
Similarly, if your leadership team has an adversarial relationship with the media, it’s likely you’ll face increased scrutiny and backlash when a crisis breaks. It’s a risky strategy and not one that is highly recommended.
On the other hand, if the PR team organizes exclusive interviews with key journalists several times each year, they will be on a first-name basis with many of the journalists covering the crisis and can expect more sympathetic coverage. Behind-the-scenes tours for journalists at factories, innovation hubs, and offices can also help to build relationships, as can roundtable discussions with journalists and senior management.
The goal is to create a collaborative, friendly atmosphere between your organization and the journalists who cover you so that you can draw on that goodwill if a crisis breaks. A well-maintained newsroom supports that relationship too: Journalists who regularly find accurate, current, well-organized information on your owned channels are more likely to treat your brand as a reliable source when a story develops quickly.
Fail to prepare, prepare to fail
Preparing for a PR crisis is a sensible course of action for any Public Relations team. It can do untold damage to a company’s reputation if an inexperienced and untrained team is thrown in at the deep end. On the other hand, by managing a crisis well a company can see its shares rebound quickly and its credibility restored.
Running a simulation involving the PR team and all senior leaders is one of the best ways to prepare. Have one member of the team create a crisis scenario and simulate your response from start to finish. This will allow your company to find any gaps in your plans before a real crisis comes along.
Your team can practice creating holding statements at short notice, writing press releases and putting together all the materials senior managers need to do a press conference. The PR team can also create crisis checklists and internal FAQ documents.
3. What to do during a crisis
At the outset of the crisis, gather as much information as you can and develop a central document with Q&A using your crisis communication software, brief your team, and clarify their roles again. You may need to designate a room that is the ‘Command Centre’ of the crisis with senior members of the Operations, Legal, and PR teams working together to make key strategic decisions at the highest levels.
If you need to coordinate a company-wide response, make sure the messaging across all departments is consistent – a one-pager with the core message, key documents, and contact information should be enough.
Your corporate newsroom plays a critical operational role from this point forward. When a crisis breaks, journalists, stakeholders, employees, and AI systems all go looking for information, and if your owned channels are silent or outdated, that gap gets filled by other sources. Designate your newsroom as the single verified publishing hub for all external crisis updates.
Every holding statement, factual update, and correction should be published there first and kept current as the situation develops. This gives journalists one reliable place to find the latest verified version of events, and reduces the risk of conflicting information circulating across other channels.
Crisis team: Roles and responsibilities
You need to know which members of your PR or Communications team will be responsible for handling crises well in advance. Any spokesperson who will have direct contact with the media needs to go through media training. In a crisis, it is more likely that your senior leaders will be your spokespersons than your PR team, so identify a shortlist of executives to go through the training annually.
Approved spokespersons should be documented clearly in your crisis response plan, as well as PR handlers with an explicit chain of command. Choose methodical thinkers who are likely to stay calm. PR team leaders and managers should be comfortable drafting statements and fielding calls from the news media, while more junior members of the team should be able to take on tasks like media monitoring and administration.
Any member of your PR team who is going to be involved in a crisis should also be fully trained up, even if they will not be the public face of the crisis. This training usually involves a mixture of learning the theory of crisis communication – like you’re doing right now – and going through simulated activities like preparing holding statements on the clock and rehearsal press conferences where public speaking skills can be honed.
Understanding your stakeholders
It’s important to define your audiences and their pain points, in order to acknowledge them, and speak with empathy, while being careful to not overpromise and underdeliver. It’s also key to map out all your stakeholders. These may include:
- The media
- The public
- Your clients and customers
- Your investors and shareholders
- Your employees
- Government or semi-state bodies
- Family or next-of-kin (in case of life-or-death scenarios)
Different audiences may need different messages. For example, when a company is making redundancies local journalists will care most about the impact the job losses will have locally, while business journalists nationally and internationally will report on the impact of stock prices.
For local journalists who will communicate the message to the community your company operates in, including the families of those made redundant, the most crucial thing to convey is empathy. On the other hand, shareholders will be most concerned about the value of their investment so it’s crucial to give business journalists the impression that everything is under the control at the company.
Internal updates
It’s important to keep your own employees informed during a crisis to avoid confusion. Communication updates (email, Intranet, company chat, etc.) should be shared with employees at the same time as any updated media statements are proactively issued. The same sentiments of care, control, and commitment should be contained within the employee update emails.
If there have been injuries and/or fatalities, further face-to-face engagements are likely to be required in order to provide reassurance and to demonstrate care and concern. These may be in the form of team briefings or larger town-hall meetings.
In each communication to employees, remind them that only approved spokespersons should speak to the press and that they should forward any enquiries to the PR team. Employees should not offer any kind of comment to members of the press who contact them directly.
Case Study: Reading the room wrongIn recent years, a number of brands have attempted to attach themselves to social movements with mixed responses. Pepsi was roundly lambasted for an ad in which Kendall Jenner brokers peace between protesters and police with a can of Pepsi, which was seen as a lazy and tone-deaf attempt to talk about #blacklivesmatter. Pepsi pulled the ad the next day. |
Managing social media during a crisis
Social media is often where a crisis first becomes visible, and where it spreads fastest. A rumour, a video, or a single post can reach a mass audience before your team has had time to verify the facts or draft a response. That no longer makes having a clear social media protocol as part of your crisis plan optional.
A few principles for managing social media during a live crisis:
- Monitor continuously: As soon as a potential crisis is detected, assign a team member to monitor all major social media channels in real time. Track mentions of your brand, your leadership, and any related keywords. Identify where the story is spreading and how fast.
- Respond on the channels where the story is moving: Don't wait for a press release to be ready before acknowledging the situation publicly. A short, factual holding statement posted on your social channels - directing audiences to your newsroom for updates - buys time and signals that your team is aware and responding.
- Correct misinformation quickly: If inaccurate information is spreading, address it directly and factually. Link back to your newsroom as the authoritative source. Avoid getting drawn into arguments - state the facts clearly and move on.
- Know when to pause scheduled content: Any pre-scheduled social media posts should be paused immediately when a crisis breaks. Promotional or lighthearted content published during a crisis - even accidentally - can cause significant reputational damage.
- Brief your social media team: Make sure whoever manages your social channels is included in crisis briefings from the start. They need to know what can and cannot be said publicly, and when.
Publish a holding statement
A holding statement is exactly what it sounds like – a statement intended to hold the media at bay while you’re dealing with a crisis or incident. It provides a brief account of what the company knows and what actions it is taking in the face of the crisis at hand. The goal is to keep the public in the know and to protect your organization’s reputation.
It’s important to act with speed and confidence when an incident that threatens your reputation occurs. Your statement needs to be just right in terms of how it’s worded, but it also needs to be ready in minutes.
Publishing it promptly on your newsroom - not just distributing it by email - also matters: during a fast-moving crisis, AI systems pull from whatever is publicly available to generate answers about your brand. A clearly structured, factual holding statement on your owned channels gives AI systems a reliable source to draw from, reducing the risk of speculation from elsewhere being surfaced instead.
Here are some tips for drafting solid statements:
- Try and include tangible actions (or ‘proof points’) that help you demonstrate the above three sentiments.
- Keep the three Ps in mind too: in any crisis response effort, people come first, then the planet (environment) and not profits.
- Never speculate: Include basic information and confirmed facts about the incident but as a general rule not why, it is likely that it will be too early to know the cause and a full investigation will follow)
- Don’t unnecessarily reveal commercially sensitive information
- If key facts are not known, this should be made clear and should not delay the drafting of the holding statement.
Always express:
Care and concern or anyone who has been affected (and/or for any environmental damage) – for example, ‘we regret to confirm three deaths at our factory during the earthquake’ or ‘we are deeply saddened that we must today announce redundancies’.
Control over the situation at the most senior level – for example, ‘every possible action is being taken to bring the situation under control’, or ‘an investigation has been launched and we are cooperating with the local government’.
Commitment to helping those affected and/or finding out the cause of the incident for example, ‘we are committed to finding out what has happened’.
Best practice suggests that a holding statement should be issued within 15 minutes of a crisis breaking, and an absolute maximum of one hour if the company wants to maintain control of the narrative.
One way to achieve this is to prepare a holding statement in advance, with some blanks left to fill in the details of the incident. Because holding statements are issued in the very early stage of a crisis, they are not generally detailed; they simply confirm that the company is aware of the crisis and proactively taking steps to manage it.
The crisis newsroom: How to lead your messaging in a crisis
Take a look at this blog to learn more on how to use your brand newsroom during a crisis.
4. Minimizing the impact on your reputation
The goal of crisis management is to handle any scenario that comes up with a robust strategy that minimizes reputational impact. Once the crisis passes, it’s important that your credibility as an organization remains intact, that the media accurately reports that the organization acted responsibly and fairly, and that consumer sentiment hasn’t turned against you.
Authenticity, openness and integrity are crucial to achieving this. If you need to let 500 employees go to save the company and the remaining 2,000 jobs, this is likely to be accepted by the public. But if the media reports that your top executives are taking huge bonuses while lower paid workers are losing their jobs, this will not play well and public outrage is likely.
Should a company apologize during a crisis?
It depends. Saying sorry at the appropriate time can be an important gesture – but it sends a clear message that the organization has done something wrong. As such, it can have wide repercussions including opening up the possibility of lawsuits. Apologies should be worded carefully, with advice from the company’s legal team.
Here’s an example of a holding statement with an apology. It comes from PWC, one of the world’s Big Four accountancy and professional services firms. At the Oscars 2017, LaLa Land was announced as Best Picture when the winner was, in fact, Moonlight. PWC were responsible for giving the presenters the correct envelope. They said:
|
We sincerely apologize to “Moonlight,” “La La Land,” Warren Beatty, Faye Dunaway, and Oscar viewers for the error that was made during the award announcement for Best Picture. The presenters had mistakenly been given the wrong category envelope and when discovered, was immediately corrected. We are currently investigating how this could have happened, and deeply regret that this occurred. - PWC |
Faced with the reality that they had made a huge mistake, PWC stepped up immediately and didn’t make excuses. They admitted their mistake, apologized and opened an investigation. They also expressed empathy and gratitude to those affected.
They went on to issue further statements clarifying what happened, and took full responsibility. As a result, the Board at the Oscars actually voted to retain them as their accounting firm, and PWC put new processes in place to ensure the same mistake never happens again.
Because they managed the crisis effectively, PWC retained a prestigious customer and minimized the damage to their reputation.
5. After a crisis
Learnings are a vital part of the crisis communications process. Any scenario that comes up once is likely to do so again – how can you be better prepared next time? The core team should be given the opportunity to give feedback on how the processes worked. Additionally, every team member who took part should receive individual feedback, and should be scheduled for more training if needed.
More importantly, however, a report should examine how the department handled the crisis as a whole. It should examine:
- The extent and tone of media coverage, online and offline
- What was the outcome in terms of the company’s reputation?
- Did public sentiment shift?
- What was the impact on share prices?
- How did the team’s pre-existing relationship with the media help or hinder your efforts?
- How did the newsroom perform as a source of truth? Was it kept current, and did journalists and stakeholders use it as their primary reference point?
- How did the crisis story spread across AI platforms? Was your brand represented accurately, and were there gaps in your owned content that allowed inaccurate information to be surfaced?
- What was the internal feedback from senior management on how the PR team performed?
In the weeks and months after the crisis has abated, these learnings should be used to update processes and procedures so that the company is well prepared for any future crisis.
Conclusion
Every crisis is different. The scale, the cause, the stakeholders involved, and the channels through which it spreads will all vary. What stays constant is this: the organizations that manage crises well are almost always the ones that prepared before the pressure arrived.
When you look at the organizations that have managed crises well, the common thread is rarely brilliance under fire. It's preparation - a plan that existed before the crisis hit, roles that were clear, and channels that were ready to publish the moment they were needed.
The principles that determine how a crisis is remembered are not complicated: care for those affected, control of the verified facts, and commitment to communicating clearly throughout. The organizations that embody those principles under pressure are the ones that come through with their credibility intact.
The next crisis to hit your organization may come from an unexpected direction. It may spread faster than you anticipate, across more channels than you planned for, and reach audiences - including AI systems - that didn't exist as a factor when your last crisis plan was written. That is exactly why preparation, clear owned channels, and a team that has practiced under pressure matter more than ever.
Get the crisis kit
The crisis communications kit includes a holding template, a risk assessment and mitigation template, and a crisis comms checklist.